the cops act out this insecurity by criminalizing individuals in advance. threatened), it is not their person but the command and control principle that is threatened. There is only the military ethic of power, imposed on civil society through an assumption of impunity.To defend that control through assault or murderous action against a disobedient person implies that the cop’s own identity is wholly immersed in its paradigm. It is the ethos of democracy, of human self-respect, that is the threat.
the cops act out this insecurity by criminalizing individuals in advance. threatened), it is not their person but the command and control principle that is threatened. There is only the military ethic of power, imposed on civil society through an assumption of impunity.To defend that control through assault or murderous action against a disobedient person implies that the cop’s own identity is wholly immersed in its paradigm. It is the ethos of democracy, of human self-respect, that is the threat.Tags: Cover Letter For Tax Professional PositionEssay On Nursing PhilosophyCovering Letter For Application For Freshers EngineerDarden 2011 Application EssaysGeorgetown Essays MbaAbortion Against Abortion EssaySoftware Engineer Cover Letter UkAnswer For Critical And Creative Thinking QuestionsEssay School Holiday Spm
Given the profits made by arms manufacturers, the defense industry, gun dealers and the lobbyists who represent them in Congress, it comes as no surprise that the culture of violence cannot be abstracted from either the culture of business or the corruption of politics.But money in politics is not the only major institutional factor in which everyday and state violence are nourished by a growing militarism.As David Theo Goldberg has argued in his essay “Mission Accomplished: Militarizing Social Logic,” the military has also assumed a central role in shaping all aspects of society.For instance, as Steve Martinot observes at Counter Punch, the police now use their discourse of command and power to criminalize behavior; in addition, they use military weapons and surveillance tools as if they are preparing for war, and create a culture of fear in which militaristic principles replace legal principles.He writes: This suggests that there is an institutional insecurity that seeks to cover itself through social control … When police shoot a fleeing subject and claim they are acting in self-defense (i.e.Over 270 mass shootings have taken place in the United States in 2015 alone, proving once again that the economic, political and social conditions that underlie such violence are not being addressed. For example, one child under 12 years old has been killed every other day by a firearm, which amounts to 555 children killed by guns in three years.An even more frightening statistic and example of a shocking moral and political perversity was noted in data provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which states that “2,525 children and teens died by gunfire in [the United States] in 2014; one child or teen death every 3 hours and 28 minutes, nearly 7 a day, 48 a week.” Such figures indicate that too many youth in the United States occupy what might be called war zones in which guns and violence proliferate.Violence runs through US society like an electric current offering instant pleasure from all cultural sources, whether it be the nightly news or a television series that glorifies serial killers.At a policy level, violence drives the arms industry and a militaristic foreign policy, and is increasingly the punishing state’s major tool to enforce its hyped-up brand of domestic terrorism, especially against Black youth.In this scenario, guns and the hypermasculine culture of violence are given more support than young people and life itself.Focusing merely on mass shootings or the passing of potentially dangerous gun legislation does not get to the root of the systemic forces that produce the United States’ love affair with violence and the ideologies and criminogenic institutions that produce it.