September 11 Research Paper

Secretary of State Colin Powell called the attacks “an act of war” and President Bush confirmed in an evening televised address to the Nation that he would “make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them”.Former CIA Director James Woolsey, without mentioning Afghanistan, pointed his finger at “state sponsorship,” implying the complicity of one or more foreign governments. "The Window, at the Moment of Flame" Pinsky, Robert.

Tags: Critical Thinking TutorialIs Macbeth A Tragic Hero EssayMuet Essay MaterialisticProfessional Resume Writing Services WinnipegEssays On Robber BaronsEssay On Importance Of Birds And AnimalsArgument Essays Can Further Developed

"South Tower, 96th Floor, Corner Office" Sleigh, Tom. "September 2001" Szymborska, Wislawa, "Photograph from September 11" Vinograd, Julia. "(The movie set on the horizon glows)" Williams, C. captures the heartfelt reactions, eyewitness accounts, and diverse opinions of Americans and others in the months that followed the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and United Airlines Flight 93.

The archive of writings includes poems written by University students, faculty, staff, and alumni.

After 9/11, the campaign of media disinformation served not only to drown the truth but also to kill much of the historical evidence on how this illusive Al Qaeda “outside enemy” had been fabricated and transformed into “Enemy Number One”.

“The official theory of the collapse, therefore, is essentially a fire theory, so it cannot be emphasized too much that fire has never caused large steel-frame buildings to collapse—never, whether before 9/11, or after 9/11, or anywhere in the world on 9/11 except allegedly New York City—never.” See David Ray Griffin).

The tragic events of 9/11 provided the required justification to wage war on Afghanistan on “humanitarian grounds”, with the full support of World public opinion and the endorsement of the “international community”.

Several prominent “progressive” intellectuals made a case for “retaliation against terrorism”, on moral and ethical grounds.

The entire national security agenda would collapse “like a deck of cards”.

The war criminals in high office would have no leg to stand on.

This was a known fact, corroborated by numerous sources including official documents of the US Congress, which the mainstream media chose to either dismiss or ignore.

The intelligence community had time and again acknowledged that they had indeed supported Osama bin Laden, but that in the wake of the Cold War: “he turned against us”.