If you determine that your study is seriously flawed due to important limitations, such as, an inability to acquire critical data, consider reframing it as an exploratory study intended to lay the groundwork for a more complete research study in the future.
Be sure, though, to specifically explain the ways that these flaws can be successfully overcome in a new study.
Title: The Use of Differentiated Mathematical Strategies With Secondary Students With Asperger’s Syndrome Program of Study: Administrative Leadership and Teacher Learning Purpose of Study: This mixed methods case study uses theories of the Zone of Proximal Development, Information Processing, Structural Cognitive Modifiability, and Metacognition to explore the effects of differentiated mathematical strategies on seventh grade students with Asperger’s Syndrome.
Most universities offer comprehensive guidelines in their dissertation manuals about how to set up and organize the dissertation and the proposal.
Remember that the method you chose may be the source of a significant limitation that has emerged during your interpretation of the results [for example, you didn't interview a group of people that you later wish you had]. Acknowledge it, and explain how applying a different or more robust methodology might address the research problem more effectively in a future study. Inflating the importance of your study's findings could be perceived by your readers as an attempt hide its flaws or encourage a biased interpretation of the results. Negative evidence refers to findings that unexpectedly challenge rather than support your hypothesis.
A underlying goal of scholarly research is not only to show what works, but to demonstrate what doesn't work or what needs further clarification. Writing the Empirical Social Science Research Paper: A Guide for the Perplexed. Academia.edu; Structure: How to Structure the Research Limitations Section of Your Dissertation. If you didn't get the results you anticipated, it may mean your hypothesis was incorrect and needs to be reformulated.In the Social Sciences, the dissertation proposal generally consists of the first three chapters (in a five-chapter format) or the first two chapters (in a four-chapter format).Here is a generic outline for a five-chapter dissertation.Claiming limitations is a subjective process because you must evaluate the impact of those limitations.Don't just list key weaknesses and the magnitude of a study's limitations.Here are examples of limitations related to methodology and the research process you may need to describe and discuss how they possibly impacted your results. “All That Glitters Isn't Gold: A Survey on Acknowledgment of Limitations in Biomedical Studies.” PLOS One 8 (November 2013): 1-6.Note that descriptions of limitations should be stated in the past tense because they were discovered after you completed your research. Information about the limitations of your study are generally placed either at the beginning of the discussion section of your paper so the reader knows and understands the limitations before reading the rest of your analysis of the findings, or, the limitations are outlined at the conclusion of the discussion section as an acknowledgement of the need for further study.Keep in mind that acknowledgement of a study's limitations is an opportunity to make suggestions for further research.If you do connect your study's limitations to suggestions for further research, be sure to explain the ways in which these unanswered questions may become more focused because of your study.You should answer the question: do these problems with errors, methods, validity, etc. For example, if a meta-analysis of existing literature is not a stated purpose of your research, it should not be discussed as a limitation.Do not apologize for not addressing issues that you did not promise to investigate in the introduction of your paper. Regent University of Science and Technology; ter Riet, Gerben et al.