Tags: Admission Essay TipsEssay People RememberingEssay On Television AdRubrics Content EssayThe French Revolution EssayElectronics Capstone Project IdeasBernard Marx Brave New World Essay
The sequence of results presented should tell a logical story; you may not present your results in the same order in which you conducted your experiments. Does it agree or disagree with what others have found?In this section you discuss the meaning of your results. Are they what you expected, or do they go against what you thought would happen? Does it complete a project that someone else has started? This section, like the Introduction, may include citations to previously published work. This may be included as a last paragraph in the discussion section, or may be set apart as a separate section.This section summarizes what happened in your experiments.
what are the scientific principles underlying this work? If you used standard published procedures for certain parts of you work, you can simply state that fact and cite a reference that gives a full description of the procedure.
If you developed you own technique, or made any modifications in someone else's technique, then you should briefly yet completely describe it.
Such figures and tables should be clearly labeled with brief yet complete descriptions of what they contain in their titles or captions.
A rule of thumb to follow is that figures and tables should be able to stand alone; a reader should not have to refer to the text to understand what is being presented.
Another important rule is that the data presented in figures or tables should not be repeated in the text.
You should refer to the appropriate figure or table in the text as you are describing your work, but don't make the reader read the same data twice.This should include all parameters used, indications of the number of samples that contributed to the analysis and any initial conditions, if relevant.When presenting simulation results, provide insight into the statistical confidence. If there's a "strange" behavior in the graph (e.g., a dip, peak or change in slope), this behavior either needs to be explained or reasons must be given why this is simply due to statistical aberration.Remember that any idea that is not you own must be credited!Each reference must contain enough information so that it can be found again. Papers can be divided roughly into two categories, namely original research papers and survey papers. If you can, find two people: one person familiar with the technical matter, another only generally familiar with the area.In the latter case, gathering more samples is probably advised. You can never lay out the whole parameter space, so provide insight into which parameters are significant over what range and which ones are less important.It's not very entertaining to present lots of flat or linear lines.You should also acknowledge and funding agency that may have paid for your research materials or hourly salary (e.g. The notes below apply to technical papers in computer science and electrical engineering, with emphasis on papers in systems and networks. There are papers that combine the two elements, but most publication venues either only accept one or the other type or require the author to identify whether the paper should be evaluated as a research contribution or a survey paper.