For this he tries various topics, things, body, etc..
But each time, are good reasons to raise a question mark 2) the mind that apprehends doubt himself and goes before the verb be “me at least, am I not something?
“One thing that doubts, conceives, affirms, denies, wills, does not that also imagines and feels.” These are the functions commonly attributed to the spirit, yet not knowing yet if the body exists, it must leave untouched the question: are there two distinct substances?
Until know, I should accustom the mind to think, to his spirituality.
The Third Meditation demonstrates that not only do we exist, but that God exists as well.
The Fourth Meditation identifies the sources of our errors in the illegitimate use of our reason, while the Fifth and Sixth Meditations conclude by reestablishing, with absolute certainty, the existence of things and the material world.It is the spirit that controls and informs the world, and is the foundation of all true knowledge of the world.See that the mind acts even when we do not expect it: in perception.The only way forward was to subject every belief to doubt and scrutiny in order to find out whether there were some ideas we have that can be said to be true beyond any possible doubt.Given this background, it is in Descartes’s Meditations on First Philosophy that readers are able to grasp the full extent of his endeavor.Regarding academia, says Descartes, what became apparent was the fact that despite the history of philosophy containing some of the greatest minds in the history of humanity, it was a history of a discipline that was more divided than united.This splintering characterized a proliferation of views on a given issue, rather than a progressive unity of resolved problems.So the question “what am I,” Descartes replies “a thinking thing” At first thought was that the sign that I am, by which the mind frees itself from the question “am I? Here, it is a sign that I’m thinking (deepening of the “I”) 5) I am a thinking thing.Initially, Descartes laid the verb to be, then, he tried every possible subject, wondering if their existence into question the bear, now he asks “I am” and tried all possible attributes by asking whether the “I” can exist without them Result: the thought alone can not be detached from me (I have not had before thinking by chance: it is his way of being critical, but for knowledge, a detailed exploration of I was required) 6) He showed that I am, I am a thinking thing, now: what is a thinking thing?It is the function of the piece of wax, which supports the distinction between the sensible and the real: real object = object intelligible as essence of body size, then: whenever we talk about reality, meaning and imagination must be exceeded, even when it comes to material reality, let alone when it comes to thinking mind Descartes comes to mind, and the affirmation of his existence and the ease of his knowledge, that was the issue of all this digression on the piece of wax.It is the spirit which is the basis / foundation of all our knowledge of reality.